I believe term limits and quite possibly age limits MUST be instituted in order to avoid disasters like the ones we're currently experiencing.
The ultimate example:
Prez Dementia Don — yes, it can certainly be argued that he’s always been this astoundingly stupid and insane. I would never dispute that. Possibly it’s just more obvious now because he’s on the world’s stage all the damn time. Still, dementia can remove a person's social filter by damaging the brain’s frontal lobe — this manages self-control. Not that old DD ever had decent social filters or self-control to begin with. He does appear to be much worse this second term. Maybe that's just me?
Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was clearly fading long before he became Zombie McConnell.
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) died in office at the age of 90 after a long decline in her health. I guess she was Mitch’s role model.
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is 93 and contemplating running for another term in 2029. If he’s still alive in ’29, he’ll be 96-years-old. Does a wealthy 96-years-old white man understand the needs, struggles, the daily lives of the average Iowan? I think the fuck not.
Also, two people can be in their 80s and have wildly different levels of physical and cognitive function.
Fer instance, Bernie Sanders is 85. He’s around six months older than Glitch McConnell, who’s cruelly being Weekend-at-Mitch’s for reasons that only makes sense if you’re a lockstep member of the Republican cult. Bernie is still all there mentally and he’s physically fit for an old guy. People age at different rates. Should Sanders retire? Is he standing in the way of fresh, charismatic, dynamic Democratic Socialists or other progressives? Is the fresh blood growing old, wasting away in the wings or no?We had sort of the same issue here in Massachusetts with the recent primary. Incumbent Senator Ed Markey is 80. He’s a progressive, co-authored the Green New Deal, co-authored the American Clean Energy and Security Act, was the principal author of the 2007 energy independence law that raised vehicle fuel economy standards, etc. His opponent, Seth Moulton, is young, wealthy, a center-right Democrat, and ran a campaign that was 85% “Markey’s old!” Yeah Dude, he’s old but he’s got more on the ball than you and he represents Massachusetts’ citizen's interests a whole fuckton better." Markey won by an overwhelming amount.
Obviously you can be older, or in a wheelchair, needing a seeing eye dog, require voice to text tech or other communication assistance and still be a brilliant senator, representative, judge, president, whatever. It’s what’s upstairs that counts. How’s your brain functioning?
There should be a team of completely independent medical experts to determine the functional standards necessary to do these jobs. Elected officials deserve some medical privacy, but we deserve to know that these people, making big fat decisions on our behalf, are or are NOT fully capable of doing their damn jobs.
Testing needs to be done and NOT just the simple-ass cognitive testing where you identify which animal is the lion and which one's the camel. How about a citizenship test — same one that immigrants have to take — and a thorough test on the Constitution and all the Amendments? Ya know, for starters.
Term limits and medical guardrails address different problems. A younger member can become seriously ill, while an older member can remain capable. Medical standards shouldn’t be based completely on age. I mean, look at Fetterman. He’s young but his stroke clearly tipped him totally over the edge.
And, fer fuck’s sake, this isn’t even considering the Supreme Court. TERM LIMITS!!!!
Criminal Clarence Thomas is 78
Always-On-The-Take Alito is 76
Constitution Violator John Roberts needs to GO
Brett Gang Rapist Kavanaugh
Horrifically Callous Gorsuch
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was 87 when she died of cancer while still on the Supreme Court. Had she retired in 2010 when she was 77, President Obama could have replaced her. Instead, Trump replaced her with the very young, unqualified, religious cult belonging whack job handmaiden.
Another thought ...
Maybe universities don’t need to have rape factories. Sorry, I meant to say fraternities.Here’s an interesting commentary/comparison of Caravaggio’s Judith Beheading Holofernes versus Artemisia Gentileschi’s version found on Threads. I wouldn’t find the author’s real name but here’s a link to her page.
The first is Caravaggio’s Judith Beheading Holofernes.… Look at Judith. Delicate arms. Mild expression. She almost looks inconvenienced or bored. Her maidservant, an aged afterthought.
Now look at the second, Artemisia Gentileschi’s version.
Artemisia was a woman painting in the 1600s who had been raped by her father’s colleague, Agostino Tassi.
....
When she testified against him, she was tortured during the trial to “verify” that she was telling the truth.
Now look at HER Judith.
Knitted brow. Forearm muscles engaged. Body weight behind the sword. Her maid is helping restrain him. These women aren’t decorative witnesses to violence. They are physically, furiously acting.
Same biblical woman. Same act.
But one was painted by a man imagining female existence. The other was painted by a woman who understood female rage.
Not all men but enough so that women would be total fools to trust any dude until he’s been seriously vetted.























