In a recent Substack post, Bizarro creator Dan Piraro talked about how the US doesn’t have a name so much as a description — we’re called the United States of America. Think about it. It's also only accurate if we’re talking about the collection of our taxes. Apart from that, on what are we united?
Piraro goes on to say:
My guess is we are not too far away from our wannabe king suggesting we name the country after him. We may all be living in the Forever Authoritarian Republic of Trump before long. The only upside of that would be that people the world over would doubtless refer to it as “FART.” (source)
At this point, after all we’ve done to immigrants, Venezuelan fishermen, Iranians, our own citizens, and the whole rest of the world, FART or FARTlandia seems like an absurdly gentle, understated name. After yesterday's taxpayer funded, white trash, fascist, tacky-as-all-hell birthday party for the ancient, insane, pedophilic, loaded diaper of a president, FARTlandia is immensely appropriate (if understated) though.
| Dan Piraro, Bizarro |
This collection of states and territories that are considered to be the “United States” are anything but united. I mean, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, and the Dakotas probably have a lot in common. New England and New York State are almost always on the same wavelength but NOT with those previously mentioned states.
California, Oregon, and Washington could stand together. Would the Deep South, Texas and Oklahoma join with them? //snort// Not in a trillion years or with a gun to their heads. How about the Midwest? //shrugs// It might make sense to break up and form half a dozen independent countries.
Here’s the thing though, most of the gerrymandered-to-hell-and-back Republican states are taker states. That is, they receive more in federal funding than they pay in federal taxes. How long would the new countries of Texahoma, Southlandia or YeeHawistan survive without California, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, buckos? Seriously now.
Also, will liberal people stay in a new country that’s hostile to them? I mean, I get it – you were born and raised in Texas. It’s home. You’re used to being around a lot of folks with vastly different morals and ethics but NOW those differences are being made into law. Abortion is already illegal in Texas. Maternal mortality rose 56% in the first full year of the state's ban. The state does NOT care if women die.
Mothers living in states that banned abortion are nearly 2x as likely to die during pregnancy, childbirth, or soon after giving birth, compared to mothers living in supportive states where abortion was legal and accessible (source)What other inane, insane, shortsighted, control-freaking, micro-dicked laws will the white Christofascist moldy potatoes enact once they have half a chance. Yee haw!
According to the Georgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security scale, Texas comes in at 41 out of 51 (50 states plus the District of Columbia) on women’s equality.
The US WPS Index captures key aspects of women’s status at home, in the community, and in the economy and society. The index is structured around three basic dimensions: inclusion (economic, social, political); justice (formal laws and informal discrimination); and security (at the individual and community levels). The index and its 12 indicators, grouped into these three dimensions, provide a standardized, quantitative, and transparent measure for ranking all states.If the US becomes balkanized, the only women left in the former red states will be the ones who were too poor or otherwise lacking a help network to get out. Ah, who knows. Maybe modern day Scythian warrior women (AKA Amazons) or Onna-musha warriors will form up. Possibly some Valkyries can get involved. Ya know they were, maybe still are, thought of as death demons, spirits of carnage.
Way cool, eh?
In any case, Happy Monday from FARTlandia!
💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨 💨







_,_affresco_staccato.jpg)
























