My understanding is that she’s in the same vein as Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro, and Charlie Kirk – people who take reality, shred it, then weave it into a tapestry of right-wing fears, fantasies, fetishes, fault-finding, rage, and shame.
Candace Owens is now being sued by the President of France and his wife because she’s been running around spewing that Mrs. Macron’s a man or was one.
In fact, Candy’s been broadcasting that Brigitte Macron was a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux. Ya know who actually IS Jean-Michel Trogneux? Brigitte Macron’s still very much alive and taking nourishment older brother. In fact, he stood at her side at Emmanuel Macron’s two presidential inaugurations in 2017 and 2022.
First – ‘the hell? Did Candy dear run out of Democrats to make up Bizarro World fairy tales about so she had to jump over to Europe? Why’s she picking on the French President’s wife?
Second – even if Mrs. Macron HAD been born male (she’s wasn’t nor has she ever been male), who the fuck cares? How is Brigitte's gender Candy or anyone else’s business?
Ya know, Crazy Candy doesn’t care. All this is just to get attention, to get the spotlight focused on her. She’s not a bright or gifted person so behaving like a complete low rent carnival clown twatzilla was her only path to fame and fortune.
In a YouTube video, Owens called the suit an “obvious and desperate public relations strategy,” and said the first lady is “a very goofy man.” (source)
Why do these right-wing lunatics care so damn much about the reproductive equipment of people whose politics differ from their own. Did Candy make up some elaborate fantasy where Brigitte Macron, pre-transition, was Candy’s betrothed, her soulmate? Now that she’s Brigitte, not Jean-Michel, Candy feels horribly betrayed, cheated, and humiliated and is out for revenge?
Another thought, given the whole right-wing crazy-pants schtick of accusing others of the secrets they’re shamefully hiding, I’m thinking Candy’s accusations MUST mean that she herself is a man.
Based on repeated Republican actions, this is just simple logic.
I mean, look at Lauren Boebert’s sordid little life. She claims the Christian family values myth and ran on a law and order platform BUT gives out hand-jobs in theaters in front of kids, married and had four children by a dick flashing violent pedo, raised a son, Tyler, who knocked up his 15 year old girlfriend, broke into cars to steal credit cards, driver’s licenses, and passports, AND has just been busted for child abuse.
On a scale from "not at all" to "not even the tiniest bit" how surprised are you that Lauren Boebert raised a child abuser? Plus, she has quite the arrest record herself.
Then there’s Nancy LOOK AT ME-LOOK AT ME Mace who, minutes after voting against releasing Epstein files, hopped on Twitter to scream that "All child rapists should get the death penalty.”
WHY do I know who these people are? They should be less relevant and impactful than those pesky door to door god sellers. HOW do some of these these nimrods get into government?!
Critical thinking skills need to be taught in schools since they’re sure are hell not being taught at home.
No comments:
Post a Comment